The 5 Habits Framework

1) Evidence (How do I know what's true?)

2) Perspective (Who might think differently?)

3) Connections (What other areas of knowledge are connected?)

4) Supposition (How might it be different if..?)

5) Significance (Is this important?)

Monday, October 27, 2025

Kohler Made a Camera for Your Toilet

  

Kohler Made a Camera for Your Toilet

Dekoda device scans waste to assess hydration, gut health, and more

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2025/oct/21/poop-cam-dekoda-throne

Evidence

  1. What specific data, design details or testing information does the article provide about how the device detects waste-type, hydration, or blood traces and how reliable or transparent is that evidence?

  2. Does the article disclose any independent studies, peer review or regulatory approval supporting the device’s claims-- and if not, what impact does that have on the strength of the evidence?


Perspective

  1. Which voices are included (the manufacturer, tech reviewers, health experts) and which perspectives are missing?

  2. How might the interpretation of this product differ if described from the perspective of someone concerned with data privacy or digital surveillance rather than health optimization?


Connections

  1. How does this device connect to broader themes of health-technology, smart home devices, personal data analytics, or “quantified self” culture?

  2. What real-world examples or prior innovations (such as wearable health trackers, smart toilets, or home-health sensors) could you mention to deepen the analysis of how this product fits into a larger ecosystem?


Significance

  1. Why is this product significant for individual health monitoring, consumer privacy, the home environment and what implications might it have for the future of “connected health”?

  2. Which groups are most affected (consumers, manufacturers, regulatory bodies, vulnerable users) and how does the article present the scale and magnitude of potential impacts?


Alternatives / Supposition

  1. What alternative explanations might there be for why someone would buy this gadget (e.g., novelty, status, anxiety about health) that the article does not explore?

  2. Suppose the device fails to detect a serious health issue how might that change our trust in such home-health technologies, and what does that tell us about the roles of human professionals versus automated monitoring?


Extension Activities:  

Ethics & Design Workshop: Students design their own health-monitoring bathroom device (or app) and then conduct a mini-peer review focused on privacy, consent, data ownership and cost implications.

Research & Debate Assignment: Students investigate real-world examples of “smart home health tech” (including this device) and present pros & cons in a structured class debate, highlighting the social, economic and technological connections.

No comments:

Post a Comment